Lies and truths about climate change

He recently appeared in alternative media, as rafapal.com or StarViewer the scandal has been uncovered as a result of a post uncovered by a hacker, who has assaulted the accounts of the scientific elite linked to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC ), involving the calentólogos a matter of manipulating data and destroying evidence that exert strong pressures to silence skeptical scientists. If you want to see the mails can see them at this link.

Skepticism about the official theories on climate change is not new (I advise reading [link removed], is two years but in full force). Parallel to orchestrated by scientists and environmentalists that is enacted that increased temperatures on the planet is a consequence of increased CO2 in the atmosphere, there was another in which he argued that the increase in CO2 is a consequence and not moving one Because of this warming it is actually caused by a natural increase in the sun's activity.

Like so many other times we face a conflict of interests trying to confuse public opinion with direct or indirect economic objective. The header block by scientists and environmentalists have clearly political interests. Green parties see it as an instrument to gain followers in the difficult arena of the political scene. In fact, they are forcing traditional parties to snag the environmental bandwagon to avoid losing the youth vote, mainly. Other clever politicians realized that take climate change by flag would be a great springboard to leap to the forefront of today and to stay there for long. I am referring to Al Gore. More stakeholders are non-fossil energy lobbies who see climate change and people's concern about a potential source of subsidies from governments to implement systems for the generation of clean energy, reducing net investment that would to perform if the situation were different. And above all, those who benefit most are young scientists who live scholarships and grants from governments (in this battered allocation dedicated to R & D) paid studies, such as the effect of climate change on the sexuality of the beetles, effect of climate change in the consumption of dates, or the impact of rising sea temperatures on the thickness of the shell of crustaceans.

On the other hand, the main overland interested in pulling this environmental movement are companies in the oil lobby, which is one of the largest in the world, and the politicians and governments to avoid having to dedicate items to reduce CO2 emissions into the atmosphere, which inevitably would have to leave an unpopular tax increases or budget lines divert other areas such as defense, health or other with the consequent social impact, and the anger of the groups involved.

Given this scenario, you do not know what to think. I saw this documentary while denying causal association between increased CO2 and temperature increase. It's very interesting. I advise you not to miss it. In favor of this theory are other studies such as the one we saw in the article on the disappearance of the Maya, in which it was found that there was an increase in temperature on a global level for a prolonged period and nothing happened (well, except for the disappearance of Maya).